Robotic esophagectomy: Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer – a randomized controlled trial

Authors

  • S. van der Horst University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands: Department of Surgery
  • P.C. van der Sluis University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands: Department of Surgery
  • A.M. May University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands: Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care
  • C. Schippers University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands: Department of Surgery
  • L.A.A. Brosens University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands: Department of Pathology
  • J.C.A. Joore University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands: Department of Intensive care medicine
  • A.C. Kroese University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands: Department of Anesthesiology
  • N. Haj Mohammad University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands: Department of Medical Oncology
  • S. Mook University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands: Department of Radiotherapy
  • F.P. Vleggaar University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
  • I.H.M. Borel Rinkes University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands: Department of Surgery
  • J.P. Ruurda University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands: Department of Surgery
  • R. van Hillegersberg University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands: Department of Surgery

Keywords:

Robotic esophagectomy

Abstract

Background: The standard curative treatment for patients with esophageal cancer is perioperative chemotherapy or preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by open transthoracic esophagectomy (OTE). Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy (RAMIE) may reduce complications and improve functional recovery.

Methods: A single center randomized controlled trial was conducted, assigning 112 patients with resectable intrathoracic esophageal cancer to either RAMIE or OTE. The composite primary endpoint was the occurrence of overall surgery-related postoperative complications (modified Clavien–Dindo classification (MCDC) grade 2-5).

Results: Overall surgery-related postoperative complications occurred less frequently after RAMIE (59%) compared to OTE (80%) (risk ratio with RAMIE (RR) 0.74 (95% Confidence interval (CI), 0.57-0.96; P=0.02). RAMIE resulted in less median blood loss (400ml versus 568ml, P<0.001), a lower percentage of pulmonary complications (RR 0.54 (95%CI, 0.34-0.85; P=0.005) and cardiac complications (RR 0.47 (95%CI, 0.27-0.83; P=0.006)) and lower mean postoperative pain (visual analogue scale, 1.86 versus 2.62; p<0.001) compared to OTE. Functional recovery at postoperative day 14 was better in the RAMIE group (RR 1.48 (95%CI, 1.03–2.13; P=0.038)) with better quality of life score at discharge (mean difference quality of life score 13.4 (2.0-24.7, p=0.02) and 6 weeks post-discharge (mean difference 11.1 quality of life score (1.0-21.1; p=0.03)). Short and long-term oncological were comparable at a medium follow up of 40 months.

Conclusions: RAMIE resulted in a lower percentage of overall, surgery-related and cardiopulmonary complications with lower postoperative pain, better short-term quality of life and a better short-term postoperative functional recovery compared to OTE. Oncological outcomes were  equal and in concordance with the highest standards nowadays. This randomized controlled trial provides evidence for the use of RAMIE to improve postoperative outcome in patients with resectable esophageal cancer.

Published

2020-02-15

Issue

Section

European Champions League