Transactions on Additive Manufacturing Meets Medicine
Vol. 5 No. S1 (2023): Trans. AMMM Supplement
https://doi.org/10.18416/AMMM.2023.2309818

Material Properties, Structural Designs, and Printing Technologies, ID 818

A patient-matched additively manufactured implant for treatment of thumb amputations: biomechanical analysis and cadaver study

Main Article Content

Chiara Bregoli (National Research Council - CNR ICMATE, Lecco, Italy), Jacopo Fiocchi (National Research Council - CNR ICMATE, Lecco, Italy), Carlo Alberto Biffi (National Research Council - CNR ICMATE, Lecco, Italy), Kavin Morellato (INAIL Centro Protesi, Budrio, Italy), Federico Stacchiotti (Istituto di BioRobotica, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy), Rubens Ferrari (Istituto di BioRobotica, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy), Mario Lando (Department of Hand surgery and Microsurgery, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy), Roberto Adani (Department of Hand surgery and Microsurgery, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy), Priscilla Di Sette (Hand and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico A. Alesini, Roma), Michele Rampoldi (Hand and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico A. Alesini, Roma), Emanuele Gruppioni (INAIL Centro Protesi, Budrio, Italy), Ausonio Tuissi (National Research Council - CNR ICMATE, Lecco, Italy)

Abstract

Thumb amputations accounts for 60 % loss in hand functionality [1]. Passive silicone vacuum prosthesis and autologous transplantation are the most adopted solutions: however, silicone prostheses lack in stability and surgical treatment is not always well accepted by patients. Osseointegrated prostheses were demonstrated to improve stability restore osseoperception, and increase the time of prosthesis use [2]. As thumb amputations may differ in stump size, a standard size implant cannot address the specificity of each patient, while a patient matched solution can meet surgeon requirements by adapting the geometrical features of implant. In the current work a first additively manufactured patient-matched osseointegrated implant for the treatment of thumb amputees is presented. The implant is realized in Ti6Al4V ELI medical grade powder by using Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) technology. A finite element model (FEM) for the analysis of the mechanical strength of the implant was carried out. The FEM was validated by means of experimental tests according ASTM F543. Finally, considerations on performance of the prototype were carried out by means of insertion tests in Sawbones and axial pull-out force assessment. Once the design was confirmed, a cadaver test was performed to evaluate the entire procedure. CT images were collected, a preoperative planning was designed in accordance with surgeons and the proper patient-matched implant was realized in LPBF technology. The cadaver test positively assessed the entire process and confirmed a good overlapping between preoperative planning of the device and postoperative results.


Author’s statement
Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest. Acknowledgments: All authors thanks Nicola Bennato and Enrico Bassani from National Research Council of Italy, Lecco for their technical support.  Research funding: This work was supported by INAIL (Istituto Nazionale per l’assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro) [grant number PR19-PAS-P4 – ADJOINT].


References
[1] C. Bregoli, C.A. Biffi, K. Morellato, E. Gruppioni, M. Primavera, M. Rampoldi, M. Lando, R. Adani, A. Tuissi, Osseointegrated Metallic Implants for Finger Amputees: A Review of the Literature, Orthop. Surg, 2022, 14, pp 1019–1033.
[2] P.I. Branemark, Osseointegration and its experimental background, J. Prosthet. Dent., 1983, 50, pp 399–410.

Article Details

How to Cite

Bregoli, C., Fiocchi, J., Biffi, C. A., Morellato, K., Stacchiotti, F., Ferrari, R., … Tuissi, A. (2023). A patient-matched additively manufactured implant for treatment of thumb amputations: biomechanical analysis and cadaver study. Transactions on Additive Manufacturing Meets Medicine, 5(S1), 818. https://doi.org/10.18416/AMMM.2023.2309818

Most read articles by the same author(s)